The $150 Computer: An Inside Look at Mini PC Design and Compromise
Update on Oct. 9, 2025, 10:41 a.m.
In an era where flagship smartphones routinely surpass the $1,000 mark, a peculiar paradox exists on our desktops: the fully functional, remarkably capable $150 computer. It’s a device that can drive dual 4K displays, handle dozens of browser tabs, and stream high-definition media, all while consuming less power than a traditional light bulb (typically idling under 10 watts). How is this possible? What engineering magic and, more importantly, what deliberate compromises, allow for such a machine to exist?
This is not a review or a buyer’s guide. Instead, this is an autopsy. We will be deconstructing a representative sample from this burgeoning category: the KAMRUI AK1PLUS, specifically a model equipped with an Intel N100 processor, 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM, and a 256GB SSD. By placing this specific device under the microscope, we aim to uncover the first principles that govern the entire budget Mini PC market. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to look beyond a spec sheet and understand the intricate balance of power, price, and practicality that defines these compact marvels.

The Heart of Efficiency: Understanding the Intel N100 Processor
At the core of our $150 sample lies the Intel Processor N100. To understand this chip is to understand the foundational shift in low-power computing. The N100 is not a stripped-down version of Intel’s high-performance Core i7 processors. Instead, its DNA comes from a different lineage: the “Efficient-cores” (E-cores) originally developed for Intel’s hybrid architecture, designed to handle background tasks and light workloads with maximum efficiency.
Think of a traditional high-performance CPU core as a world-class sprinter, built for explosive speed at a high energy cost. The four E-cores in the N100, by contrast, are more like highly efficient marathon runners who can still pull off a respectable sprint when needed. Their strength lies not in record-breaking top speed but in competently handling multiple, parallel tasks—like rendering different parts of a webpage and decoding a video stream—simultaneously and with minimal power draw. When a task demands a burst of performance, the processor can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 3.4GHz, ensuring responsiveness. This design philosophy makes the N100 an expert at multitasking the mundane, which constitutes the vast majority of our computing activity.
For the user, this translates to a quiet, cool-running machine that excels at office productivity, web browsing, and serving as a home theater PC (HTPC). It can smoothly decode 4K video at 60Hz not through brute force, but through dedicated hardware accelerators and the efficient parallel processing of its E-cores. It is, by design, a master of sufficiency.

Memory & Storage: The Unseen Speed Boosters
A processor, no matter how efficient, is only as fast as the data it can access. This brings us to the components that feed the N100 its instructions and data: the system’s memory (RAM) and storage.
Our sample unit features 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM. The “LP” stands for Low Power, and it’s a critical detail. In a compact, thermally constrained device, every watt saved is a victory against heat and noise. LPDDR5 not only consumes less voltage than its desktop counterpart, DDR4, but it also offers significantly higher data transfer rates. This wider bandwidth acts like a larger highway for data, reducing bottlenecks between the CPU and RAM, resulting in snappier application loading and smoother multitasking.
Equally transformative is the use of an M.2 Solid State Drive (SSD). Even though budget Mini PCs often use the more economical SATA interface rather than the faster NVMe standard, the leap from a mechanical Hard Disk Drive (HDD) is monumental. With no moving parts, an SSD’s ability to retrieve data is nearly instantaneous. This is the component most responsible for the “feeling” of speed: quick boot times, responsive applications, and silent operation. The AK1PLUS further enhances its value proposition with a simple but brilliant feature: an expansion bay for a 2.5-inch SATA drive. This provides a lifeline for users who will inevitably fill the primary 256GB drive, allowing for an easy and cost-effective storage upgrade up to 2TB—a feature that dramatically extends the device’s long-term usability.
The Art of Compromise: Deconstructing Design and Connectivity
With a potent combination of an efficient CPU and fast storage, it seems like we have a perfect machine. But how is all this packed into a $150 price tag? The answer lies in the art of compromise, a series of deliberate engineering choices that define the final product. To understand this, let’s analyze the trade-offs using a framework.
The Cost-Performance-Compromise Matrix
| Feature Area | What You Get (Performance) | What You Give Up (Compromise) | The “Why” (Cost Implication) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | 4 Efficient Cores, Low Power Draw | Lower single-thread performance (Not for heavy gaming/compiling) | Using E-cores is vastly more cost-effective and requires a less complex cooling solution. |
| Connectivity | 2x USB 3.0, 2x USB 2.0, Dual 4K HDMI | No USB-C or Thunderbolt, only two high-speed ports | USB-C/Thunderbolt controllers and port licensing add significant cost. Limiting high-speed ports reduces motherboard complexity. |
| Build & Cooling | Compact plastic chassis, quiet fan | Plastic feels less premium; fan can become loud and CPU can throttle under sustained heavy load (e.g., 80-90°C during updates). | An aluminum chassis is more expensive to manufacture. A more robust cooling system (vapor chamber, larger heatsink) would increase size and cost. |
| Serviceability | Easy 2.5” drive expansion | Internal M.2 SSD is difficult to access due to adhesives on the cooling shroud. | Using adhesives is faster and cheaper on an assembly line than using screws and brackets. It sacrifices repairability for manufacturing efficiency. |
Case Study 1 (Connectivity): The inclusion of two USB 3.0 ports is adequate, but not generous. The omission of USB-C is a clear cost-saving measure, as it avoids the expense of the more complex controller chip required for this versatile port. This is a calculated bet that the target user—a home office worker or media consumer—is less likely to have cutting-edge peripherals that demand USB-C or Thunderbolt speeds. * In short: The ports are sufficient for today’s common needs, saving you money on features you might not use yet.
Case Study 2 (Build & Cooling): The plastic chassis and the cooling system are a study in balancing “good enough” with affordability. The system runs nearly silent under light loads, a major user experience win. However, reports of CPU temperatures spiking to 90°C under heavy, sustained loads like a major Windows update reveal the system’s thermal limits. The cooling solution is designed for the typical “bursty” nature of office work, not for running at 100% CPU for extended periods. * In short: It’s built to be quiet for everyday tasks, but its cooling has limits if you push it too hard for too long.
Case Study 3 (Serviceability): Perhaps most tellingly, as revealed in detailed teardowns, is the use of adhesive to secure the internal cooling shroud. This makes accessing the primary M.2 SSD a perilous task for the average user. From a manufacturing perspective, adhesive is cheaper and faster to apply than screws. From a user perspective, it renders a theoretically modular component practically non-upgradable.
* In short: It’s easy to add more storage, but replacing the main internal drive is made difficult to keep the initial price down.

Conclusion: The Informed Perspective
The $150 Mini PC is not a miracle; it is a masterclass in targeted engineering. It doesn’t try to be a computer that does everything for everyone. Instead, it aims to do the most common things—browsing, streaming, writing—exceptionally well for its cost and power budget.
Returning to our sample, the KAMRUI AK1PLUS, we see not just a product, but a physical manifestation of these design choices. The efficient N100 processor, the inclusion of an expansion bay, and the dual 4K outputs represent a deep understanding of the target user’s needs. The limited high-speed ports, the plastic build, and the challenging internal access represent a clear-eyed acceptance of what must be sacrificed to meet an aggressive price point.
The true value of deconstructing this machine is not to decide if the AK1PLUS is “good” or “bad.” It is to gain a new lens through which to view the entire category. Now, when you see any Mini PC, you can ask the right questions: What kind of cores does its processor use? What compromises were made in its connectivity and cooling to meet its price? How does it balance initial storage with future expandability? You are no longer just a consumer reading a spec sheet; you are an informed observer, capable of understanding the delicate and fascinating art of the $150 computer.